take a number

according to The Essential Ennagram by David Daniels and Virginia price I’m fairly clearly a seven. yes folks. two years ago i was a three and before that a six - or so i’ve said. fickle thing that enneagram (it certainly isn’t me). mom, on the other hand, thinks maybe a nine is appropriate, and why not throw some more numbers out there for good measure. but get this:

“I am an optimistic person who enjoys coming up with new and interesting things to do. I have a very active mind that quickly moves back and forth between different ideas. I like to get a global picture of how all these ideas fit together, and I get excited when I can connect concepts that initially don’t appear to be related. I like to work on things that interest me, and have a lot of energy to devote to them. I have a hard time sticking with unrewarding or repetitive tasks. I like to be in on the beginning of a project, durring the planning phase, when there are many interesting options to consider. When I have exhausted my interest in something, it is difficult for me to stay with it, because I want to move on to the next thing that has captured my interest. If something gets me down, I prefer to shift my attention to more pleasant ideas. I believe people are entitled to an enjoyable life.”

Now, that certainly sounds like someone I know. and you should see what else it says about me. it says i avoid pain at all costs and disarm with humor. who would have thought it? i get stressed by overload from all the things i want to be part of and angry at negative people. sometimes i may even write posts on apathyism or avoidance in favor of wine and cheese (or so it says, but who would believe a book…).

2 Responses to “take a number”

  1. carl Says:

    Dad’s a seven, too.

    I’m a six. Pretty clearly and consistently. With a five wing. Though I don’t have a book to quote from about either one at the moment.

  2. eric Says:

    hmmm, yeah, well. not so consistent here. i’m looking through about five enneagram books and none of them seem to agree - though i’m feeling fairly comfortable somewhere on the six/seven line. in one book seven will fit perfectly and six looks nothing like me, in the next it will be the other way around.

    from my favorite book so far, i’m going six with a seven wing (though unfortunately this book only mentions wings in passing - so doesn’t give any detail to back that up). the problem seems to be that many books simplify the six to responsability and the seven to irresponsability, when i think it has very little to do with that.

    the other day, talking about being a six, Michelle made some vague unrelated statement to which I responded “Are you saying I’m paranoid?”

    Today I’d like to make it clear that I connect most closely to the negative aspects of the six and feel bad about it (and more than a bit aprehensive about your obvious impending judgments). I’m also very excited about all the various future possabilities for my seven wing. (or do I have those backwards? anyone? validate my thinking please…).